att.canonical
att.canonical provides attributes that can be used to associate a representation such as a name or title with canonical information about the object being named or referenced. [13.1.1. Linking Names and Their Referents] | |||||||||||||||||||||
Module | tei | ||||||||||||||||||||
Members | att.naming [att.personal [addName eventName forename genName name objectName orgName persName placeName roleName surname] author birth bloc collection country death district editor event geogFeat geogName institution offset origPlace pubPlace region repository rs settlement state] authority catDesc correspDesc date distributor docAuthor docTitle funder material meeting object objectType principal publisher relation resp respStmt sponsor term time title unitDecl unitDef | ||||||||||||||||||||
Attributes |
| ||||||||||||||||||||
Example | In this contrived example, a canonical reference to the same organisation is provided in four different ways. <author n="1"> <name ref="http://nzetc.victoria.ac.nz/tm/scholarly/name-427308.html" type="organisation">New Zealand Parliament, Legislative Council</name> </author> <author n="2"> <name ref="nzvn:427308" type="organisation">New Zealand Parliament, Legislative Council</name> </author> <author n="3"> <name ref="./named_entities.xml#o427308" type="organisation">New Zealand Parliament, Legislative Council</name> </author> <author n="4"> <name key="name-427308" type="organisation">New Zealand Parliament, Legislative Council</name> </author> The first presumes the availability of an internet connection and a processor that can resolve a URI (most can). The second requires, in addition, a prefixDef that declares how the | ||||||||||||||||||||
Note | The key attribute is more flexible and general-purpose, but its use in interchange requires that documentation about how the key is to be resolved be sent to the recipient of the TEI document. In contrast values of the ref attribute are resolved using the widely accepted protocols for a URI, and thus less documentation, if any, is likely required by the recipient in data interchange. These guidelines provide no semantic basis or suggested precedence when both key and ref are provided. For this reason simultaneous use of both is not recommended unless documentation explaining the use is provided, probably in an ODD customizaiton, for interchange. |